The Visual Analogue Scale. An Alternative to the Likert Type Response Scales. An Alternative to the Likert Type Response Scales

A paper describing the initial version of the graphical user interface designed for the QCA package, using John Fox’s Rcmdr source files.

Research methodology
Response scales
Internal consistency
Likert scale

Authors
Affiliations

Valeriu Frunzaru

Published

2011

Abstract

For about eight decades, research instruments in the social sciences have been orbiting around Likert’s proposal for his famous response scale. Before him, and also after he managed to impose it, many researchers have tried to find a better solution. This, however, has proven difficult. While solving methodological problems for measuring concepts, by concentrating all the responses in only five categories brings major disadvantages as well: it has extremely low variation, it does not produce metric scores unless combined with similar items, and it cannot be used as such for advanced statistical analysis. In this article, we propose using a continuous response scale as a solution to each of these problems. In our opinion, the possible application of this solution has an extremely high potential to advance social science research methodology.

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@article{dușa2011,
  author = {Dușa, Adrian and Frunzaru, Valeriu},
  publisher = {University of Bucharest},
  title = {The {Visual} {Analogue} {Scale.} {An} {Alternative} to the
    {Likert} {Type} {Response} {Scales.} {An} {Alternative} to the
    {Likert} {Type} {Response} {Scales}},
  journal = {International Review of Social Research},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {91-103},
  date = {2011-08-01},
  url = {https://irsrjournal.unibuc.ro/volume1_issue1/},
  doi = {10.1515/irsr-2011-0005},
  issn = {2069-8534},
  langid = {en}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Dușa, Adrian, and Valeriu Frunzaru. 2011. “The Visual Analogue Scale. An Alternative to the Likert Type Response Scales. An Alternative to the Likert Type Response Scales.” International Review of Social Research 1 (1): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2011-0005.